I don’t really understand your criticism of using a Marxist lens. It is essentially a tool to analyze and critique a text through the perspective of class. It’s used by historians and other theorists worldwide, even those who don’t subscribe to a left-wing ideology.
Is the switch from "diversity, EQUITY, and inclusion" to "diversity, ETHICS, and inclusion" intentional or an error. If intentional, will you please explain?
I don’t really understand your criticism of using a Marxist lens. It is essentially a tool to analyze and critique a text through the perspective of class. It’s used by historians and other theorists worldwide, even those who don’t subscribe to a left-wing ideology.
Is the switch from "diversity, EQUITY, and inclusion" to "diversity, ETHICS, and inclusion" intentional or an error. If intentional, will you please explain?
This just confirmed my suspicion of the Howard County System. Why the drastic changes?